A repository of Agility, Management and Organizational Psychology

Month: April 2024

Think again. Always

Progress is impossible without change; and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.

George Bernard Shaw

Ok! This above quotation should be enough to convey the entire message of the importance of considering that – perhaps for a moment – you may not to be so sure or that there simply is some better option. And this applies to any subject in life, but let’s focus here on the process of developing a product or service.

The author Adam grant talks in his book “Think Again” about the traps we are subjected to when a) we believe we don’t know enough; and b) when we believe we know more than the average. The author makes an interesting comparison between the “imposter syndrome” and “armchair coach syndrome” as he calls it.

In a professional environment, the imposter syndrome can put as in a position of inferiority, submission, avoiding giving opinions, suggesting changes, giving feedback, and above all subjecting us to uncomfortable situations to avoid confrontation, and that is terrible. But this text is about the other syndrome.

The question is that the “armchair expert” syndrome can be just as bad or even worst. Let me explain a bit. The author exemplifies this syndrome describing persons who commonly, due their love for football, feel much more prepared than the coaches of their teams, even though they know only a fraction almost insignificant, of the entirety of this sport’s magnitude and have never even participated in any amateur team.

These people, because they have some superficial knowledge on the subject, feel superior to others, ignore what they don’t know and refuse to consider that they probably – almost always – know less than the majority.

(In the book, the author even describes studies on this subject. I strongly recommend).

Arrogance is ignorance plus conviction

Tim Urban – Blogger

The danger of assumed intelligence

People who feel qualified enough or even more qualified than others can become an obstacle for work teams, leading discussions to unproductive terrain or even – depending on their position – restricting or conditioning conversations.

Innovation requires control, of course, but no decision is one hundred percent safe, not even the best-known path. Always doing it the same way can be a team’s fundamental mistake. Trying to change something that already works and also makes a profit, too.

Rethink is a skill set, but it’s also a mindset. We already have many of the mental tools we need. We just have to remember to get them out of the shed and remove the rust.

Adam Grant on Think Again: The power of knowing what you don’t know

Look for opportunities for teamwork

The greatness of teamwork is having the opportunity to expand, in addition to productivity capacity, also the field of vision, as we bring together knowledge, skills and experiences from different point of view (and of life).

Skills such as active listening, long life learning, ideation techniques and other creativity tools can be the way to avoid this syndrome.

Retrospective events can make it easier for the team to reflect on past events that, over the course of the days, went unnoticed, but could have been better and then create action plans for the future.

Refinement events allow team members to look again at something planned for the near future and revisit concepts that may have been left aside or no longer make sense.

No solution fits perfectly in all cases, but perhaps Adam Grant’s suggestion is still positive. Knowing what you don’t know may be his greatest power.

Does agility resolve interpersonal conflicts?

I Recently read a very interesting book that aligned with my current situation in life, called “The courage to be disliked”. It is a book based on the psychology of Alfred Adler that places the world in a perspective of individual psychology and the innate characteristic of every human being to seek coexistence in society.

I was impressed by how long it took me to realize the synergistic – I would even say obvious – relationship between this thought with the Agile Manifesto and that’s why I decided to briefly write down my perceptions in this post.

Does the agility also resolve interpersonal conflicts?

All problems are based on interpersonal relationships

Alfred Adler

The first principle of Agile Manifesto states that we must keep “the individuals and their interactions” above procedures and tools. This principle argues that only through a genuine desire to cooperate and overcome the differences is possible a productive and harmonious work environment.

Adler’s provocation about this context serves as yet another reference to the importance of keeping this natural factor in view, managing it and always keeping it as a point of attention.

In addition to the four principles, the agility also proposes twelve values that, when observed, contribute greatly to the good experience of everyone involved in the project, whether they are developers or sponsors.

When the Agile Manifesto proposes that “the best architectures, requirements and designs emerge from self-organized teams” we can make an equivalence with the excerpt from the book where Ichiro Kishima and Fumitake Koga state that “(…) a person only becomes an individual in social contexts”.

Perhaps at first this relationship above is not so obvious but I’ll try to explain my point of view. In a self-organized team, each member has the opportunity to develop all their values, expressing their limits, defining their desires, contributing their ideas and values and collaborating with the constant and continuous maintenance of this “universe” in which they belongs.

I don’t intend to go too far in this article about the relationship between Man and Work, but it is undoubtedly a subject that I intend to develop soon. For now, just consider the importance of occupation for the sense of belonging to any productive Man.

Cooperation as key tool for resolving conflicts

The feeling of community is the key concept so debated in Adlerian psychology

ICHIRO KISHIMA E FUMITAKE KOGA

For Adler, the compass to continue moving towards happiness is “Contribution to others”. Likewise, the Agile Manifesto preaches “collaboration with the customer” as one of its principles in addition to “constant cooperation between people who understand the ‘business’ and developers”, “relationship of trust”, “face-to-face conversation”, and again “self-organization” as essential values for a good work environment.

I couldn’t say how many of the signatories of the Agile Manifesto have knowledge in this area of psychology, or even if any of them had access Adler’s proposal and manifestations. I have always learned that the entire manifesto was developed based on the empirical experience of the participants, and this undoubtedly strengthens the importance of these themes for the work environment.

Realize that the “trenches” vision and the “thinker” vision, despite being described in different terms (and at different times) preach the same principles and values aimed at mitigating problems that affect social life, productivity and human nature satisfaction may be yet another indication that we need to consider adopting them as widely as possible in our day-by-day lives, professional or otherwise.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén